Tuesday, November 23, 2021

An MBS item to counsel smokers? It's just a load of smoke

 Tobacco smoking remains prevalent in Australia – current estimates suggest that we have about two million adult smokers.


This number has fallen in recent decades as the enormity of problems associated with smoking have become clearer.

Nevertheless, according to analyses from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare in 2019, the proportion of pack-a-day (20 cigarettes or more) smokers increased with age.1

Two in five people (approximately 40%) in age groups 40 and over smoked more than 20 cigarettes per day, which compared to one in five (approximately 20%) people aged 18–39. It’s ironic that smoking is more prevalent among older people at higher risk of tobacco-induced death.

 

Public health-based approaches, such as tobacco taxes underpinning massive price hikes, banning the advertising of tobacco, either directly or indirectly with zero investment in sports sponsorship since 1992, have combined with clinical counselling for smokers to cause smoking to become far less common.

But we have a long way to go.

While tobacco taxes are considered the most effective tool to reduce smoking, clinical approaches and counselling have gained in sophistication and impact, sometimes using nicotine replacement preparations in concert with advice. 

The late Dr Michael Russell, a psychiatrist with a major interest in addiction, and three colleagues including a GP, published a paper in the BMJ in 1979 that reported attempts to get 2000 established smokers in London to quit. It caused a storm.2

The study was based on the patients of 28 GPs.

The smokers were allocated into four groups; a non-intervention group, a group that was given a questionnaire about smoking, a third group that was advised by their GP to stop smoking (but nothing else was done) and a fourth group who were advised to stop smoking, given a leaflet to help them, and warned that they would be followed-up.

The effects were small with 5.1% of those in group four – who received advice, literature and follow-up – stopping smoking in the first month and still not smoking after a year.  

But here is the crucial sentence taken from the abstract of their BMJ paper: “[The results were] achieved by motivating more people to try to stop smoking rather than increasing the success rate among those who did try.”

Earlier this month, the Federal Department of Health proposed a Medicare item to fund at least 20 minutes of smoking cessation counselling with a GP, who will then be tasked with drawing up a management plan.

The health department says a dedicated item will help GPs become more familiar with updates to clinical smoking cessation guidelines and their use.

However, such an approach assumes the intervening GP knows that a patient of theirs is a smoker – but if they don’t they’re unlikely to act. 

That sounds miserable, but studies by Professor James Dickisnon and colleagues from Newcastle published in the Medical Journal of Australia have shown that between 20% and 40% of smokers presenting in general practice are not known by their GPs to be smokers.3

It is these ‘quiet Australians’ that Dr Russell and his team would have us recognise, and try to help, rather than bothering with identified smokers who make no progress, despite us spending lots of resources attempting to get them to quit.

Read more:

I know this proposition will not find favour with dedicated educators and clinicians who have spent much personal energy developing packages to assist practitioners counsel established smokers.

There is no reason for such efforts to be ignored or undervalued, save for the question – are we spending the health dollar wisely?  

If a Medicare item encourages a 20 minute counselling approach to smoking cessation, then the dollar won’t be available for Dr Russell-type approaches.

He argued that the success of ultra-simple interventions in general practice would see 25 long-term successes per GP every year. And if all 20,000 GPs in Britain (in 1979) adopted it, 500,000 smokers would be helped to quit in one year.

No fuss, no bother, inexpensive and time efficient.

This result would be better, Dr Russell said, than what could be achieved by setting up “10,000 smoking withdrawal clinics” a year to manage difficult and dependent patients, often with little chance of successful quitting. 

“GPs, on the other hand, see all kinds of smokers, including those who are more likely to succeed and will not necessarily need intensive treatment and support. Firm advice to stop smoking, without any accompanying treatment or support, may be as effective as protracted treatment at special withdrawal clinics,” the researchers wrote.

The fundamental point at issue is whether supporting 20-minute consultations for quitting is a wise use of public money.  

I do not believe it is when the alternative is supporting GPs to provide economical and brief support to all the smokers they encounter in their daily practice.

Acknowledgement: I am grateful to my colleague Professor Simon Chapman, emeritus professor in public health at the University of Sydney, for his comments.

References:

1.       AIHW 2020; National Drug Strategy Household Survey 2019  

2.       Br Med J. 1979 Jul 28; 2(6184): 231–235)

3.       MJA 1989 Apr 17;150(8):420-2, 425-6.


Published in Medical Observer Opinion
21st June 2021

Should AHPRA deny registration over COVID-19 vax refusal?

 The speed and skill of COVID-19 vaccine developments is impressive. The extent to which such viral vaccines prevent death and — in the short-term — serious illness has been established in randomised trials.  




But do they prevent infection and what are their long-term effects?

We don’t know yet as that information comes only from careful follow-up of many vaccinated people. The data we have at hand are incomplete but encouraging.

In a Q&A on the vaccines in the New England Journal of Medicine, Professor Paul Sax, an infectious disease specialist at Harvard Medical School, US, sums up the current information well.

 “Findings from population-based studies now suggest that people without symptoms are less likely to transmit the virus to others. It would be highly unlikely in biological terms for a vaccine to prevent disease and not also prevent infection,” he writes.1

“If there is an example of a vaccine in widespread clinical use that has this selective effect — prevents disease but not infection — I can’t think of [it]!

“The likelihood is that these vaccines will reduce the capacity to transmit the virus to others. [But], the protective effect will never be 100%, which is why … we still recommend the use of social distancing and masking in public.

“These caveats notwithstanding, the likelihood that these vaccines will reduce the capacity to transmit the virus to others remains excellent.”

Read more: Your rights: Can your practice demand you have the COVID-19 vaccine?

In light of this, all healthcare workers — unless exempted on sound medical grounds (a rare situation) — should be expected to have the vaccine, not only to protect themselves, but to protect their patients.

This has raised the question of whether vaccination should be mandatory.

Around one third of 400 respondents to an Australian Doctor poll agreed it should be compulsory for healthcare workers in high-risk settings including GP practices, hospitals and aged care facilities.

The remaining two thirds said it shouldn’t be made compulsory. Their reasons were evenly split; first, because efficacy and safety of the current vaccines are not guaranteed and second, because vaccination should be a choice.

Several respondents said that unvaccinated health workers should be expected to inform patients accordingly.

These are valid concerns for now.

But, let’s imagine a time when it’s proven that COVID-19 vaccination prevents infection, transmission, serious disease and illness. And that is found to have no serious side effects.


Read more from Professor Leeder:

In this case, I believe compulsory vaccination for all healthcare workers would be in the public interest. 

I would even go so far as to say that vaccination could come under the jurisdiction of AHPRA — which regulates more than 740,000 doctors, nurses and other health professionals.

The regulator would deny registration to unvaccinated practitioners.

Sound heavy-handed?

Not when you consider the alternative.

Published in Medical Observer Opinion
3rd March 2021

 

'Welcome to God's waiting room': A leading doctor reflects on his retirement

 

There is something vaguely automotive about the word ‘retirement’ — it carries the faint odour of worn-out tyres.

Last century retired teachers in my secondary school returned to teach us physics and chemistry because of staff shortages.

They were known as ‘retreads’. They didn’t last long.

When I retired from the Western Sydney Local Health District on 30 June last year, at age 78, I sensed a corporate sigh of relief. 

My formal farewell was delightful, but the underlying message was clear.

“Out with the old; in with the new!” said one senior manager who wished me Godspeed.

There’s nothing like retirement to lift the lid on otherwise hidden existential realities.

“Welcome to God’s waiting room!” a fellow retiree said to me.

Look up life expectancy tables and prepare to take fright. Only 10 years left (at best)? 

Think of 10 years ago — seems but as yesterday. Already sharp by day, these figures assume dagger-like forms at 3am or 4am.

Retirement is a big deal.

Handsome young feel-good gurus on social media, with wide smiles, perfect teeth, and advice to drink six glasses of water a day, make fortunes selling psychological trusses and bandages to keep us happy in retirement. 

Nevertheless, it is a life event. It perturbs the organism. It strips us of our identity. It cancels our power and influence. Yesterday’s rooster (excuse the sexism) has become today’s feather duster.

But let’s get this straight. We doctors are incredibly fortunate to have had generally deeply fulfilling professional lives. 

Most people do not have this immense privilege. This does not cancel the existential stuff, but it does put it in context.

That we can still function well in our 60s or 70s is an uncommon luxury, not open to sportspeople, tradespeople, or miners. And generally, we are pretty financially secure.

Read more from Professor Leeder: As an 'aged and at risk' doctor, I’ve been thinking ...

If we are reasonably healthy and have loving domestic arrangements, then our privilege is even greater.

So, when to retire?

We can only answer as individuals.

Common wisdom suggests we should move on before our decline is a danger to others. We are lucky if we have colleagues who can offer some gentle counselling on such a deeply emotional issue. At times, ageing robs us of the ability to be self-critical.

Fortunate are those who look to retirement as an opportunity to engage more deeply in music, art, writing, reading, faith-based activities, creative gardening, or bushwalking and are well enough to pursue these interests.

But those substitutes may not answer our deeply held desire to do things that contribute to human well-being.

Grandparental duties may partly fill this void. But beware!

I met my late dear friend Dr Bernie Amos after lunch one afternoon in the NSW Department of Health car park.

The department’s director-general looked weary. He explained that he had been caring for grandchildren.

He asked if I knew the best part of the morning. Before I answered he reached into his pocket, smiled, withdrew his car keys, and jangled them saying: “This!”

You don’t need me to rehearse all the suggestions for self-preservation after retirement.

They usually include proposals for maintaining physical and mental wellbeing often through social groups, preferably including people young enough so that conversations are not like those you hear in outpatients where ailments, and grumbles about healthcare dominate.

Friends devote hours to crosswords and love it. Lots of fruit. Access to a good clinical psychologist if in doubt. I did.

Keeping alive intellectually as far as dementia permits is critical.

I was reminded recently by a lively American friend in his 80s of something that Carl Friedrich Gauss, the great German mathematician, wrote in 1808:

"It is not knowledge, but the act of learning, not possession but the act of getting there, which grants the greatest enjoyment."

When I have clarified and exhausted a subject, then I turn away from it, in order to go into darkness again; the never-satisfied man is so strange if he has completed a structure, then it is not in order to dwell in it peacefully, but in order to begin another.

I imagine the world conqueror must feel thus, who, after one kingdom is scarcely conquered, stretches out his arms for others.”

Read more from Professor Leeder: Should AHPRA deny registration over COVID-19 vax refusal?

To me this is rather like the lifelong journey to Ithaca, the subject of C.P. Cavafy’s truly wonderful 1911 poem.1

But don’t hurry the journey at all.

Better if it lasts for years,

so you’re old by the time you reach the island,

wealthy with all you’ve gained on the way,

not expecting Ithaka to make you rich.

Nâzım Hikmet, the great Turkish poet died in 1963, was just 61 when he wrote compellingly about living life in the face of death in his poem On Living:2

I mean you must take living so seriously that,

even when you are 70, you must plant olive trees,

not because you think they will be left to your children,

because you don't believe in death although you are afraid of it

because, I mean, life weighs heavier.

Time to plant olive trees, I think.

More information:

1.     C.P. Cavafy, Ithaca 

2.     Nazim Hikmet, On Living

Published in the Medical Observer Opinion
16 April 2021

Tuesday, June 30, 2020

WESTMEAD – from early days to the present


History… is not the arrangement of what happens, in sequence and in truth, but a fabulous arrangement of surmises and guesses held up by a banner against the assault of withering truth.
Roseanne McNulty in Sebastian Barry’s The Secret Scripture

Brutal concrete
Westmead Hospital is a fine example of brutalist concrete architecture. It was designed by Chic Campbell, a manic Canadian architect, after the first team of project developers were fired in about 1972.

McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, built around that time has striking similarities in design. Both used bold colours on doors, have (or had) carpeted corridors as wide as freeways and an unmatched sense of interior space. Both were designed to foster collaboration among clinicians of various stripes and to make it easy to integrate clinical service, research and education.

Brutal concrete conveys a message of strength and defiance against inimical environmental forces – an appropriate defence against the wild west. The land on which Westmead stands was once a stock-car racing track and dumping ground for asbestos waste from Hardies, a fibro manufacturer.

The pasture was more genteel in the days when sheep belonging to Government House at Parramatta grazed there – on the ‘west meadow’. We know nothing of its utility during the Dreamtime. Down the road was the habitat for Aboriginal people during Macquarie’s time – known as Black Town; now, Blacktown has only the Australian average of Indigenous people (9000) or 2.9% of the population.

With time, as with all hospitals, Westmead has sprouted small buildings and sheds, panels of ritzy cladding, with lightwells filled to hold clinics and bureaucratic document files. 

First contact
My association with Westmead began in 1972 when, concurrently completing my PhD at USyd, I worked two days a week with Bernie Amos. Bernie, the project overlord, was a man for whom I already had great respect and affection from our shared experiences at Royal North Shore Hospital. He was a loyal friend, supporting my headstrong departure, after two years’ internship, for an interim year in the highlands of Papua-New Guinea. That year alerted me to the importance of public health. I abandoned plans for a career in experimental neuroscience – an outgrowth of my BSc(Med) experience with John Pollard in 1963 – and, with Bernie’s support, returned to RNSH in 1969,  completing my MRACP in 1970.

The details of the luminous ‘functional brief’, written by the late respiratory professor John Read, were being interpreted and turned into policy. The brief contained sections devoted to every clinical discipline, the crucial role of education and research and much about the desired ethos. Page after page reveals a strong awareness of, and responsiveness to, the local community. Each section had been produced by academics, with the USyd front and centre. The then NSW Health Commission also featured strongly – especially through the work of several of its eminent commissioners who had joined the clinical working parties.  

The thrilling awareness of the opportunity to create an entirely new and different teaching hospital is palpable throughout John Read’s brief. This awareness energised and motivated many of the original clinical appointments. Whereas the other USyd clinical schools were grafted onto existing hospital stock, with the problems of antiquarian halls and theatres, antiquated governance and musty, desiccated traditions, Westmead could, by contrast, be big, bold and above all, NEW!

I don’t know the origin of the spark which set ablaze the enthusiasm for so bold a venture as Westmead. Health Minister Harry Jago was crucial; surgical Professor John Loewenthal and John Read were academic champions. The vice-chancellor, John Ward, was a strong supporter. I know little of the pre-history, stumbling onto the scene only in 1972. This period, which I call the Westmead pre-Anthropocene, would make a fine topic for a scholarly history.

The role of the Commonwealth was substantial. When Gough Whitlam addressed Westmead’s thirtieth anniversary celebrations he said, with a flourish of humility, “There was a point when they [the NSW govt] said they would not fund it, so I said, ‘We will’!  And do you know what, suddenly they declared that they would fund it!”

Community Medicine at Westmead
In 1973, Bernie asked me to write an implementation expansion of the brief concerning Community and Geriatric Medicine. I worked on this two days a week. I was also completing my PhD on factors affecting the lung function of 12,000 Sydney schoolchildren. My colleagues were Ann Woolcock, Ruthven Blackburn and epidemiologist Godfrey Scott in the Department of Medicine in the Blackburn Building and the School of Public Health.

The HQ of the Westmead Project Planning Team was the old Preventicare building on the north-western corner of Missenden and Parramatta Road. Chic Campbell arrived on the scene (I think) towards the end of that year.

I was no expert in Community Medicine, which might explain why my paper was well received!  John Loewenthal breezed into my office one morning to say that, after having read it, he at last understood what Community Medicine was. I considered asking for an explanation because I was, I confess, none too certain myself. Loewenthal was a great encourager of the Westmead people. Rob Griffin, the first Director of Medical Services and one of many imports from the RNSH (including John Dowsett), told me how JL would drop into his office weekly “just to see how I was going.”

The ambitious plan was to combine hospital community outreach (the community health program was still in its infancy) with geriatric inpatient, outpatient and community-based care, and to offer a general practice clinic. 

The first Westmead property – now gone!
To give visibility to the Community Medicine concept, we bought the house on the corner of Railway Parade and Hawkesbury Avenue and labelled it Department of Community Medicine, Westmead Hospital. It served as the base for the recently-formed community nursing group – the forerunner of Whitlam’s ‘community health centres’ – and we accommodated a local branch of the Family Life Movement (now Relationships Australia). The cottage remains the property of the Western Sydney Local Health District.   Community health centres, different from the original model, persist. The cottage was demolished recently to make way for the new Parramatta to Westmead light rail.

The Community Health Program, funded by the federal government in 1972, was a major initiative in the newly created Western Sydney Health Region (similar, but not identical, to the current WSLHD) , developed by the NSW Health Commission and directed by Gary Andrews, later Founding Professor of Community and Geriatric Medicine at Westmead. The teams of nurses were commissioned with due ceremony, at Lidcombe (I think). As they filed onto the stage to receive their badges from the Minister for Health, several had arms in slings or were supported on crutches. They had been equipped with fault-ridden Leyland’s Marina cars! This was an inauspicious start for an idealistic service built on the concept of health beyond the reach of clinical medicine.

I gained a good feel for Western Sydney, driving around with Bernie in his Holden Statesman (he was a superb driver) stopping for Chinese lunch. He considered it important to have an idea of the community we were proposing to serve. We attended the opening of the Mt Druitt polyclinic, with Health Minister, Kevin Stewart, where we were accosted by a disappointed local resident who told Kevin, in stern words, that the local citizens wanted a hospital, not a clinic with one bed! I met her again in 2016 – at Mt Druitt Hospital – when the WSLHD Board was visiting – and we shared happy memories.

My life in the late 1970s and early 1980s
In 1974, our family moved to London for me to pursue an NHMRC post-doctoral fellowship in clinical epidemiology at St Thomas’s Hospital in Lambeth with Walter Holland, the father of British epidemiology, and Charles Florey, son of the prince of penicillin. That was a splendid, rich 18 months of cultural and academic experience of unparalleled depth. I often felt that I had come ‘home’ – my paternal grandparents had come from a farm in Thaxted in Essex – where I met another Stephen Leeder, much my age!

The AUD was so buoyant that my salary exceeded that of Walter Holland. While consuming a dreadful coffee and bun in the pre-war cafeteria, I recall watching snow beat up the Thames. Bomb damage was still visible in sections of the hospital building and weeds grew in the cracks. At various points, rationing occurred – butter for example. The Brits thrived on this nostalgia. One day, walking to St Thomas’s, I encountered a 50-metre queue outside a small store. I asked a happily humming man what he was queuing for. “I don’t know!” he said, “but it’s such fun!” he replied, resuming his tune. There was a little corner store near St Thomas’s where I bought lunch occasionally. This was 1974. On one occasion, a woman was asking for butter. “I have only German butter,” the proprietor told her. “I’ll leave it then” was her disgusted reply.

The McMaster epiphany
In 1975 we moved to McMaster University in Canada for a year. I was intrigued by David Sackett, one of the progenitors of clinical epidemiology and subsequently of evidence-based medicine. He had been at St. Thomas’s while I was there. He had made clinical epidemiology educationally interesting. Most prior public health education I had encountered had been dry and eminently forgettable. Sackett was an educational magician. By integrating epidemiology with clinical practice and making it the foundation for quantitative research he achieved the impossible! No major research activity or educational development at Mac was devoid of a clinical epidemiological contribution and collaboration. 

Everything about McMaster was stimulating, from the architecture to the happy and creative atmosphere (including the massive cafeteria where everyone was expected to turn up for lunch).  Moran Campbell, a dazzling respiratory physiologist, was a major intellectual force: he co-authored a Lancet paper ‘What is the probability of a committee meeting?’ He and his co-author compared the turn-up at formally organised meetings (laborious) and at a spontaneous gathering of the same group at lunchtime! Lunch won!

The design of the McMaster University Medical Centre favoured flexibility in the future use of space.  There were no internal structural walls, so that rooms could be demolished and reinvented without much effort, according to desire. To enable repurposing, enough space was left between floors for workers to walk about, moving utilities to fit – plumbing and electrical outlets, for example. 

The McMaster year showed me how truly integrated research and education could work, how the combination could be clinically relevant, and how much fun working in a collegial environment could be. It was also a revelation as to how medical education could be changed from conventional didactic boredom into an exciting activity in self-directed learning. The course lasted three years. There was no formal assessment. Students defined their own learning and used the faculty as resources. They integrated with the various departments and research programs in the medical centre.

The Newcastle years
From McMaster, we returned to Newcastle. David Maddison had recruited me as the foundation Professor of Community Medicine. That, too, was exciting – a completely new venture where we had the opportunity of introducing new methods of medical education akin, but not identical, to what had been pioneered at McMaster.

In Newcastle, with its accessible and contained Hunter Region community, its own media and politics, I had an active decade undertaking population-based NHMRC- and Cancer Council- supported research with colleagues from the Faculty of Mathematics (Annette Dobson and Bob Gibberd) in cardiovascular disease (the WHO MONICA project), an RCT of school-based smoking prevention and more. I was deeply involved in developing the entirely new curriculum and was put in charge of assessment.

The new medical school was community-focused, treated the students as adults, emphasised the importance of clinical problems as the basis of medical education, assisted students to learn how to work in teams and to direct their own learning, and assessed their progress in terms of acquired skills.  Communication skills were strongly emphasised.

These were also years when I had extensive international engagement. Because of my McMaster contacts, I became the founding director of the Rockefeller-funded Asian and Pacific Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics. This trained top-flight young clinicians from Thailand, Indonesia and other countries in these dark arts. This centre was a part of an international training network – INCLEN – including training units in hospitals in SE Asia and major resource centres at Pennsylvania, McMaster and Newcastle.   

Newcastle was also where I formed a close relationship with Denis Butler, the deputy editor of The Newcastle Herald. He encouraged me to write (heavily and instructively edited) op-eds, including a series after Laurie Brereton decided in1981 to cancel the construction of a combined clinical school and cancer centre at the Newcastle Mater Hospital. Huge community pressure reversed that decision.

Denis also supported my writing Saturday book reviews. His friend, Tom Naisby, the poetry editor, did likewise with my poetic efforts. They were wild men in their own ways and added to the rich diversity of Newcastle’s cultural life. After David Maddison, a heavy smoker, died suddenly in late 1981, much changed. That was a great sadness and a terrible disruption.

Westmead revisited
In early 1985, I considered that ten years in any place was long enough and took on the directorship of the Westmead position in the hope that experience gained in Newcastle would help develop the department about which I had written in 1973. I started there the same day that Andrew Wilson commenced as my first Registrar.

It was not a happy scene. We soon lost the geriatricians who felt we were not medically kosher and who detested the rehabilitation physicians. General practice was always restive in their department and increasingly identified with the ED.

In their place, we established strengths in health economics (Jane Hall and the Centre for Health Economics and Evaluation, now a thriving unit at UTS) clinical epidemiology, health promotion, statistics, and related disciplines. Andrew Wilson, Bob Cumming, Ross Lazarus, Karen Webb, Penny Hawe, Simon Chapman, Bin Jalaludin, Allen Sheill, Stephen Jan, Beth Stickney, Jason Grossman and Vicky Flood passed through the department and went on to assume major academic and managerial positions in ageing, nutrition, environmental health and more.  

My national commitments continued over this period, serving on the Better Health Commission, the Health Goals and Targets committee and various other groups with the strong support of the then federal health minister, Neal Blewett and the secretary of the Department of Health, Bernie Mackay. These appointments led to the first set of goals and targets for Australia’s health. NSW counterparts also took my time and energy. During this time, when Medicare was established, Blewett also set up the then Australian Institute of Health – to gather statistics as we could not easily identify these when we needed them for the Better Health Commission.  He also commissioned a review of public health education and research in Australia with Kerr White from the Rockefeller Foundation and Johns Hopkins University.  Kerr White had founded INCLEN. One of his suggestions was that the school of public health at USyd should be wound down and the resources applied at Westmead – a highly provocative suggestion that led to fury at Camperdown!

During this period the Public Health Association was reinvigorated and given federal support for a secretariat. I became the first national president. The enthusiasm was palpable.  

In Community Medicine we led the development of the intranet within Westmead with the help of Ross Lazarus. Deirdre Degeling led major health promotion community programs such as Healthy Hearts West and Karen Webb, with Penny Hawe, did excellent work with the Penrith City Council developing a ‘healthy city’ program. The department provided methodological support for many clinical researchers. We developed applied public health research and had a team of over 30 by the time I left ten years later.

But Western Sydney had been a totally different ballgame from Newcastle – huge diversity, much larger, complex economically and socially. I had had culture shock for months. I wrote this poem about the experience:

HEADING WEST

In the hinterland of life
west of the coast
by 25km of traffic
dense as dust we must
confront the size
of the problem.

My brown shoes
have lost their shine
and their soles worn –
urban, ethnic, aged,
alcohol-obliviated,
club-dominated,
fast-food saturated,
Diet Coke burpurated:
is it any wonder?
Suburbs built without amenities
create misunderstandings,
offend sensitivities;

concrete poured and walls built
in haste against imaginary winds
provide no rhyme, no reason
nor do random roads and rusting gates,
yet Map 241, F13 still marks
the Mt Druitt of my soul,

and public transport is crap.

I moved to the USyd Camperdown campus in 1986, first as head of the School of Public Health and then as dean of the Faculty of Medicine in the era of the new curriculum and the devolution of authority to the clinical schools. The Westmead department of community medicine, which could have come into its own in the current era of community re-orientation and integrated care, was slowly wound up.

During my USyd career, I chaired the Health Advisory Committee of NHMRC for three years when Michael Wooldridge was health minister. I served on the Senate as a staff representative for eight years. I learned a lot about politics in academe! I continued my involvement at Westmead, serving on the board and assisting with the Respiratory Ambulatory Care Service run by Mary Roberts and John Wheatley at Blacktown Hospital. That gave me a deep understanding of home care for people with serious and continuing illness. Brilliant. I was also on the SWAHS Board at that time.

Craig Knowles as state minister for health did many constructive things to bring clinical perspectives into health district management, including establishing an advisory group chaired by John Menadue, former head of Prime Minister and Cabinet with Whitlam. That committee developed and fostered the idea of research Hubs, and we pushed that concept with great success in western Sydney, building on the initial work of Tony Cunningham and others.

After a little over five years I finished being dean. I then had 18 months at the Earth Institute with Jeffrey Sachs at Columbia University, and the Mailman School of Public Health, with colleagues Susan Raymond and Hank Greenberg. We worked on the economic impact of cardiovascular disease on low- and middle- income countries. On my return to USyd, I directed the Menzies Centre for Health Policy, initiated by Michael Frommer and colleagues and now headed up by Andrew Wilson. 
At the end of this interval, I returned to Westmead, chairing the WSLHD, editing the Medical Journal of Australia, and directing, with Helene Abouyanni’s superb support, the WSLHD Research and Education Network. It has grown include about 700 researchers and educators: we are a network, not a department. We are more a ‘community of interest’ than a bureaucratic structure. The difference is profound.

Many of our members are researchers and educators, helping manage education and research, research and governance oversight of research, financial management, intellectual property development, and statistical and support with writing papers and grant applications throughout the WSLHD. We assisted in establishing conjoint chairs in pharmacy, nursing, clinical education, allied health and preventive public health practice. We oversaw the development of a strategic plan for nursing research and, most recently, a statement of strategic intent for research and education. This was endorsed enthusiastically by the WSLHD board in March. The recent arrival from the UK of Peter Hockey, professor and director of education, ushers in a range of new options in our educational efforts.

In my most recent incarnation as Chair of the WSLHD Board, we saw great things planned through the commitment of Health Minister Jillian Skinner – leading to the redevelopment of Westmead and Blacktown/Mt Druitt Hospitals.  During my term (the past ten years) as director of the Research and Education Network, we began by having to sort out terrible financial tangles in the support of research and to re-energise the relations between the local health authority and the research community. 

It has been exciting to watch the amazing achievements of Tony Cunningham and colleagues in establishing the Westmead Research Institute and, with Jeremy Chapman, consolidating the unique and special relationships with all research entities in the precinct in the Westmead Research Hub. 
This is the year I retire. I do so after much happy experience, the joy of knowing and having worked with splendid people and having seen many achievements. We are still, as a hospital and a district, yet to fully accept our mandate to contribute to enhancing the health of the community, but that is growing.

I leave to others to describe and assess the massive redevelopments. That is a whole other story, bursting with exciting potential, and only just beginning!

A new age is dawning. Westmead – make the most of it!